Sharon F., a graduate of Stanford and Harvard, left American
Express a little over a year ago. She wanted to get into the world
of publishing, so she joined one of the media/entertainment giants
in the marketing department of one of their many magazines. She was
responsible for devising loyalty programs to ensure that
subscription holders would renew. She loved the work, excelled at
it, and caught the eye of senior management. Sharon is a very small
cog in this giant machine, but according to the chairman of this
giant, employees like her -- bright, talented, ambitious employees
-- are "the fuel for our future."
Unfortunately for this giant, the fuel is leaking. After only a
year, Sharon is leaving the company. She is joining a restaurant
start-up as head of marketing and business development. Her boss,
it appears, drove her away.
"He's not a bad man," she admits. "He's just not a manager. He's
insecure, and I don't think you can be insecure and a good manager.
It makes him compete with his own people. It makes him boast about
his high-style living, when he should be listening to us. And he
plays these silly little power games to show us who's the boss.
Like last week, he didn't show up for a 10 a.m. interview with a
candidate who had made a two hour commute just to see him, because
he had stayed out much too late the night before. He called me at
nine fifty-five A.M., asked me to break the news to her, and tried
to make it seem like he was giving me some kind of compliment, that
he could really trust me to cover for him. I can't stand behavior
like that."
Listening to Sharon, you might wonder if it is just a
personality clash, or even whether it is she who is somehow causing
the problems. So you ask her, "Does anyone else on the team feel
the same way?"
"I'm not sure," she confesses. "I don't like to bad-mouth my
boss, so I haven't really talked about it with anyone at work. But
I do know this: when I came here there were thirteen of us on his
team. Now, a year later, every single one of them has left, except
me."
Sharon's company does many things very well, both in terms of
its overall business performance and its employee-friendly culture.
But, deep within this giant, unseen by the senior executives or
Wall Street, one individual is draining the company of power and
value. As Sharon says, he is not a bad man, but he is a bad
manager. Woefully miscast, he now spends his days chasing away one
talented employee after another.
Perhaps he is a rare exception. Or perhaps the giant makes a
habit of promoting people into manager roles who are talented
individual achievers, but poor managers. The giant would certainly
hope for the former. But Sharon doesn't care one way or the other.
When Sharon told her company that she was considering leaving, they
offered her more money and a bigger title, to try and coax her
back. But they didn't offer her what she wanted the most: a new
manager. So she left.
An employee may join Disney or GE or Timer Warner because she is
lured by their generous benefits package and their reputation for
valuing employees. But it is her relationship with her immediate
manager that will determine how long she stays and how productive
she is while she is there. Michael Eisner, Jack Welch, Gerald
Levin, and all the goodwill in the world can only do so much. In
the end, these questions tell us that, from the employee's
perspective, managers trump companies.