SOURCE: http://gmj.gallup.com CONTACT: Gallup Management Journal INFORMATION: Editorial and Executive Offices 1251 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 2350 New York, NY 10020 +1.888.274.5447
19 January 2012

What China's Rise Really Means

Unless America gets its economic engine restarted and roaring, the world will have a whole new economic and political leader in the coming decades, says Gallup's chairman

by Jim Clifton
Excerpted from The Coming Jobs War (Gallup Press, October 2011)

Current economic predictions, with few if any dissenters, say that in the next 30 years, China's GDP will grow to a total far larger than that of the United States. The total world GDP in 2010 was more than $60 trillion. Of that total, the United States has about $15 trillion, or what I will call a current global economic market share of about 25%. And China currently has a GDP of nearly $6 trillion, or a market share of about 10%.

All decisions between countries on the subjects of peace, trade, environment, borders, laws, and human rights would defer to China.

You might be wondering how India and Russia will do. They might do OK, but they're starting too far back. India and Russia have GDPs approaching $1.5 trillion apiece. Almost nobody knows this because India and China are so often discussed in the same conversation, under the assumption that their GDPs are of similar size. Those who have been saying for 10 years that India is the one to watch, not China, are at least temporarily wrong. India might do well, but the country is getting routed by the Middle Kingdom.

Right now, China's GDP is more than four times bigger than India's. And it's more than three times bigger than Russia's and more than double Brazil's. Japan is close to China at slightly more than $5 trillion, but Japan's economy is even more stalled than America's. Germany is next at $3.3 trillion. The United Kingdom is just over $2 trillion, and France is just over $2.5 trillion -- and they are both stalled. And to review, the United States of America's GDP is leading the world at about $15 trillion, but stalled, while China's nearly $6 trillion GDP is on a historic, world-order-changing run of nearly 10% growth per year.

The Coming Jobs War

Over the next 30 years, with total global GDP growth of approximately 4% annually, GDP will likely grow to a total of $200 trillion. Virtually all economists I've read predict that China's GDP will bounce to about $70 trillion by 2040 -- a 35% market share of the entire world's economy. Those economists predict that the U.S. GDP will be growing at an average of 2.5% to about $30 trillion, or 15% global market share in 2040.

When and if that happens, America loses. The world changes; everything changes. China may dominate the world. But it won't have to use its military. When its GDP surpasses America's, it will dominate the world economically by a margin far more than the United States currently has. At that point, China will be the new leader of the world. All decisions between countries on the subjects of peace, trade, environment, borders, laws, and human rights would defer to China. Because more than ever, the new golden rule applies: He who has the gold, rules. And the country with the dominant GDP has the gold and the good jobs.

It's vital to understand all those GDP numbers because almighty jobs live in combination with GDP growth. Everything you just read will come true unless America gets its economic engine restarted and roaring. If not, it will slide into a new economic hell that few can imagine.

It might be hard to imagine, but there has been a preview of it in Detroit. If GDP and jobs continue to falter, a thousand big and little American cities will suddenly morph into a condition much like Detroit's. They will have declining city GDP growth. Small and medium-sized businesses will close. Big companies will have to be taken over by Washington or foreign owners. Any company that can afford to will leave. There will be massive layoffs and no jobs to replace them, huge unaffordable city debt, a decreasing tax base for the government jobs that support the community, and devastating brain drain. Houses will be bulldozed. There will be increased corruption among government leaders -- a citywide economic hell.

The United States will be overwhelmed by China unless there is an economic miracle.

Just a few decades ago, Detroit was one of the richest cities -- and arguably the best city -- in the world. It was a fantastic place to live and to run a wide variety of great businesses. But because of lousy local leadership and the rise of foreign competition, Detroit's businesses, government, and all its community support systems, including schools -- everything came off the rails. And lousy top leadership creates lousy leadership further down the chain. America lost one of the best cities in the world because Detroit lost in the competition for jobs to Japan and Germany.

What went wrong with the macroeconomics of Detroit?

Most of the blame probably could be assigned to the car companies' short-sighted leadership, management, and vision; they managed as if the United States was going to be the undisputed world economic champion forever. They could make lousy cars because who cares? Everyone in the postwar world had to buy American anyway. Consumers had no choice.

The rest of the blame should be laid at the door of overly aggressive unions that knew they could have their way with the Big Three's weak leadership. Unions make the wrong people the customers. They create organizations almost solely for the benefit of employees, not the marketplace. Neither management nor unions had the vision to see how they were making their home city noncompetitive in the new war for GDP and jobs. That's the simplest summary.

$123,000,000,000,000

The idea of America turning into one big Detroit is not far-fetched when considering the prediction of the 1993 winner of the Nobel Prize for Economics, Robert Fogel. He said that by 2040, the Chinese economy will be right at $123 trillion. That's more than three times the global economic output of 2000. China's share will be 40%, America's will be 14%, and the European Union's will be 5%. "This is what economic hegemony will look like," Fogel wrote in his article in Foreign Policy.

My own review of many economic calculations would say that Fogel was over-caffeinated as he ran his math, but he is a renowned and highly admired economist. In any case, virtually all the world's most credible economists have China as a prohibitive favorite by huge spreads to beat the United States over the next 30 years. Literally no economist I could find thinks the United States will win the upcoming economic battle of its life.

So even if Fogel is close to right, even if his prediction comes almost true, it will be jobs Armageddon in America. Its unemployment plus underemployment will rise to more than 40%. Leadership of the free world will not be just lost, but overwhelmed.

And that's the end for the American experiment in democracy. The history books will say it worked from 1776 to 2040 and then was overwhelmed by Chinese market-based communism.

Please take note: The United States will be overwhelmed by China unless there is an economic miracle. Americans are betting their entire country and the future of their children and their grandchildren on one big "unless."

Jim Clifton, Chairman and CEO of Gallup, is author of The Coming Jobs War.
Reader Comments
Peter Strom Posted On 2/9/2012 5:42:31 PM

Well this is the most dreary assessment I think I have ever read. I do agree that we need to get our economic engine re-invigorated and that will come through a combination of fiscal responsibility on the part of the federal government as well as measures that improve business' ability to innovate and hire.

However, this article overlooks the fact that the size of an economy is dependent on the population. In that regard, of course China will have a larger economy as more of its enormous population moves upward economically. However, this also creates an tremendous opportunity for the US to sell goods into a massive market. Don't overlook that while China is a top source of imports into this country, it is also one of our top export destinations as well.

Udayan Banerjee Posted On 2/9/2012 10:23:16 PM

Why would the rise of one nation mean doom for another nation?

The reason jobs left US was because somebody else was willing to do the job at much lesser salary. Rise in GDP in China has to be accompanied by a corresponding rise in income. With the rise in income will mean that the salary differential will no longer be true.

So the basic logic of this article is faulty.

Yes, like UK lost its dominance around the middle of 20th century, US will loose it dominance in next 30 years. But that does not mean people in US will be worse off because of rise of China.

There can be many other reason why we all may be worse off - Climate change, Energy crisis, Shortage of natural resources, War etc.

Countries like China & India is just trying to bridge the vast gap which exists in standard of living with the west.

Posted On 2/10/2012 8:25:47 AM

These kinds of assessments confuse relative prosperity with a zero-sum game. So, if China surpasses the U.S. in GDP, that means we all "lose"? Whatever happened to comparative advantage?

This assessment also confuses political systems with economics. "Capitalism with Chinese characteristics" is what is helping China thrive, not its command-economy policies.

The real failure is that our democracy would rather have 10 million choices of, say, potato chips rather than maximizing the potential that political freedom and cultural diversity grants us.

If we stoke the engine of social good (e.g. maximizing human capital with a more equitable society), then we will really be able to compete. Then we can be prosper and at the same time show that democracy can morally shine.

Jaydev Thampan Posted On 2/13/2012 5:03:59 AM

I am surprised by the shallow logic that has been used to support this article. China is likely to end up the largest economy in the world but will not be the richest or most dominant for the following reasons. First, the US dominates the world in a combination of hard and soft power - hard in terms of its military and technological might, and soft in terms of being a culture and economy that represents ideals of freedom and opportunity that other nations aspire to achieve. It is unlikely that China can move into these shoes without a massive rejig in its current political outlook. Second, with a population that isn't growing, a 10% growth in GDP translates into similar salary growth - which will make Chinese products (as the factory of the world) uncompetitive - thus jobs will move away from China soon. Unless it is able to move up the value chain and provide services, its growth will stagnate (btw the article assumes an average growth of 8.5% in Chinese GDP all the way to 2040, which is extremely unlikely - the leadership is already projecting a 7% growth for the next 5-year plan). Third - in the services market, China does not have a strong competitive edge over countries like India with a larger, younger, cheaper, and well-educated workforce. Fourth, the average age of the Chinese population is already 35 which will go up to 47 by 2050. The burden of this huge ageing population is a key challenge that they will need to navigate - as migration of labor will not mitigate the lower fertility consequent to economic growth, as it has in the US, UK and Canada. All said - China will not dominate the world the way the US did in the 20th century.

Please Login to Comment
  • Print this page
  • E-mail to a friend
  • Share
  • Message to the Author
See Also
Americans Still View China as World's Leading Economic Power
High-Energy Workplaces Can Save America
How to Secure U.S. Jobs
Cities: Where Good Jobs Are Created
The War for Good Jobs
Global Migration Patterns and Job Creation

Gallup Summit Spring 2012

This event provides leaders with the opportunity to discuss the crucial issues that affect maximizing performance in their organizations, learn best practices, and benchmark their practices against the world's best.