SOURCE: http://gmj.gallup.com CONTACT: Gallup Management Journal INFORMATION: Editorial and Executive Offices 1251 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 2350 New York, NY 10020 +1.888.274.5447
19 November 2009

Is Loyalty Dead?

In this grueling economic environment, it's certainly endangered. But maybe loyalty has always been an illusion.

by William J. McEwen

Companies are now looking ever more closely at their customer relationships. This is because they recognize the value of things that can endure -- especially during uncertain and turbulent times.

We shouldn't confuse "habit" with "loyalty." True loyalty represents a deeper customer connection, a fully engaged relationship.

But in today's "new normal" economic climate, customer loyalty can no longer be taken for granted. And while it may not be dead, customer loyalty shows all the signs of becoming an endangered species. One study from Catalina Marketing reports that more than half of the average brand's highly loyal customers became markedly less loyal in 2008 than they had been a year before. That's a scary figure because, as the study also notes, the defection of loyalists has already resulted in some severe drops in company revenue. When a company's once-reliable fountain of sales and profit shows signs that it's running dry, there's reason for real concern.

The question, of course, is whether this is a reflection of the current economic climate -- or an underlying characteristic of an emerging new-millennium consumer with a decidedly different mindset. That consumer places little value on brand relationships and will never demonstrate the sort of steady habits and loyalties that marked preceding generations.

Maybe customer loyalty is simply a relic of the past, something that won't return when the economy rebounds, and a notion that today's marketers can only view with wistful nostalgia. But perhaps an answer can be found in a deeper dive into the concept of what loyalty really is and what it represents.

More than a behavior

When we see evidence that customers have changed what they've regularly been buying, we assume that means they're no longer loyal. But maybe they never were.

We shouldn't confuse "habit" with "loyalty." True loyalty represents a deeper customer connection, a fully engaged relationship. If a habit has no real grounding, or if it lacks a vital emotional bond, it's merely a current behavior that's subject to change when circumstances vary or new options appear.

What's more, habits reflect past behavior, but what companies should be concerned about is future behavior. So companies ask customers about their intentions and about what they plan to do. But intentions aren't the same as actions, and customers' stated intentions often contrast sharply with what they subsequently do.

Gallup research has shown that customers' intentions are only weakly related to behavioral outcomes such as continuing to buy, shop, visit, or spend -- unless those intentions are also accompanied by strong feelings of emotional attachment to what they're purchasing or using. In fact, customers who say they definitely will continue to buy a brand but have no emotional bond with that brand wind up behaving little differently from those who say they're uncommitted or they might not continue to buy the brand.

True loyalty entails more than intention and habit. It involves an underlying psychological state, a strong bond of emotional engagement. Without that essential bond, there's no real relationship. Just because the customer has been shopping at your store, flying with your airline, or using your credit card does not imply that she will continue to do so -- at least not without a feeling of personal commitment to the relationship.

A need to be engaged

Consumers' shopping and buying habits are subject to change, but that doesn't mean they have no desire for lasting relationships. In fact, some behavioral economists contend that the desire for real relationships -- ones you can always count on -- is essentially innate. Consumers value trust-based relationships even though many don't feel high degrees of trust and confidence in a lot of the companies whose products and services they routinely use. That's why their relationships and their habits are volatile.

Customers want to feel good about what they buy and where they shop, but they don't necessarily experience those positive feelings with all brands. But why? Perhaps it's because a healthy relationship is mutual and, for it to endure, both parties must feel rewarded by its continuation. Relationships shouldn't be taken for granted, yet too frequently they are.

You can buy a brand, and you can own the brand name. But you can't simply buy the relationships.

Emotionally grounded relationships, like friendships, can't be bought and sold like property assets. But that's exactly what companies try to do when they acquire other companies; they assume that by doing so, they've also acquired the associated good will that stems from the acquired company's customer relationships. Companies are purchased not primarily for the value of their locations or their manufacturing facilities but rather for the value of their customers.

Kraft has recently shown interest in acquiring Cadbury, for example, in part for the company's prowess and expertise in making chocolate but even more importantly for Cadbury's strong customer connections, both business-to-business (retailers and grocers) and business-to-consumer (chocolate lovers), that have been nurtured over the years.

Kraft may well be able to maintain Cadbury's recipes and quality standards and thus continue to deliver on one crucial aspect of the Cadbury brand experience. However, brand relationships in other aspects are often far more complex, driven not just by the product and packaging but by the people who define the brand experience. To cite an example from another industry, can China's Nanjing Auto deliver the total ownership and driving experience that once characterized the MG brand it acquired? Or can a big bank deliver the personal in-branch experience expected by customers of the small regional bank that the larger entity recently absorbed?

Banks acquire other banks and retail chains acquire other retail chains hoping that they're buying a good deal more than locations and inventory. They're buying access to the customers who patronize those locations. They shouldn't assume, however, that they have also purchased the strength of the emotional bond that may have linked those customers to their previous provider.

If true loyalty is grounded in customers' feelings, are companies paying enough attention to them? If customers feel they are being bought and sold like commodities, it shouldn't be surprising if they feel their loyalty isn't being reciprocated -- and it shouldn't be surprising if their habits change.

You can buy a brand, and you can own the brand name. But you can't simply buy the relationships. Customer engagement must be earned. It can't be assumed.

So in recognition of this need for mutuality and reciprocity, certain actions are essential if your company seeks enduring, engagement-grounded loyalty from its customer partners. You need to:

  • Talk to your customers. Maintain an ongoing dialogue. When your customer partners need to talk with you, make it painless for them. Respond. Don't leave them confused and guessing as to what you're doing and why you're doing it.
  • Keep your customers' needs -- and their feelings -- foremost in mind. Do this consistently and continuously, whenever and however you come in contact with them.
  • Recognize and reward your customer partnerships. Let your partners know you love them. Remember their anniversaries; thank them for their business; surprise them with evidence that you care. Little things can mean a lot.

If customer loyalty is dead or dying, it may well be because companies are letting it happen. If marketers take their customers for granted, customers will likely return the favor and look elsewhere for the appreciation and recognition they seek. Reciprocity is essential for a lasting connection. Loyalty is, after all, a two-way street.

William J. McEwen, Ph.D., is the author of Married to the Brand. He is coauthor of the Harvard Business Review article "Inside the Mind of the Chinese Consumer."
Reader Comments
Wil Agwin Posted On 11/19/2009 11:01:59 PM

Loyalty is a two way street. Why would any being capable of reasoning be loyal to companies that are not loyal to their employees?

Blane Cox Posted On 11/30/2009 1:14:04 PM

My loyalty comes from the product/service. I buy a certain brand of coffee because I like it best. I don't care who makes it. When I shop for a car, I will try them all and pick the one I like best regardless of make or model. Loyalty = buy the stuff you like and can afford. Loyalty is about self interest. If a company wants customer loyalty, meet their interests. Period.

Jenn Dorothy Posted On 12/3/2009 8:17:30 AM

I agree with Wil Agwin somewhat that loyalty is two-way street.And trust me it takes a lot of time to build trust and it can be ruined with just a few mistakes. So think twice.

Jenn Dorothy
Ass.Manager - [url=http://www.giftygifts.co.uk/novelty-aprons-c-58.html"]funny apron[/url]

Amy Gregory Posted On 12/10/2009 12:38:12 PM

I agree that loyalty is refelcted in behaviors and attitudes. However it also has an element of time. A single "switch" from previous loyal behavior may be due to convenience, absence of the usual product (out of stock), etc. I don't agree that loyalty is an endangered species, particularly since your narrative suggests that the research is looking at a potential shift and as you suggest due to the state of the economy. You need to consider attitude and behavior over time. As for the first sentence of your second paragraph, was loyalty ever taken for granted? If so, shame on the companies that did so.

Gonzalo Alanis Posted On 12/10/2009 12:38:20 PM

Interesting point!... Build good relationships with clients is the key to keep their interest on the brand or products.

Janet Hatleberg Posted On 12/10/2009 1:03:54 PM

There will never be loyalty and trust from consumers until companies earn it, its as simple as that.

David Herrmann Posted On 12/10/2009 1:23:33 PM

Loyalty is indeed illusionary. The article hints at that fact during the discussion of the purchase of Cadbury by Kraft. If Kraft walks away from the Cadbury method of treating their customer, the brand will lose the loyalty of their customers. They will feel betrayed and walk away. Then the Cadbury name will on the heap with Olds, Pontiac, Plymouth of famous brands.

MARK HERALY Posted On 12/10/2009 1:48:15 PM

There is no loyalty to a company. There is however loyalty to value and receiving the best possible product and/or service available. How a consumer has been treated in the past will simply allows them to consider you in the future, assuming that they don't don't perceive that a better value is available elsewhere. You only get one chance to be considered the next the customer is looking to purchase.

Alisa Mattison Price Posted On 12/10/2009 1:48:18 PM

I don't know where it truly began, but the decline in loyalty seems to have crept into just about every key area in our western society - employer/employee relations, consumerism, marriage, church, etc. In our insatiable quest for results, it seems that valuing and pursuing "a fully engaged relationship" has been lost. Unfortunately, companies seem to see the light when it affects the only thing that matters to them, the bottom line. Perhaps articles such as this will aid in helping leaders across the spectrum to finally understand that "delighting the customer" must begin at home. What a concept. Cheers!

Jay D. Buchanan Posted On 12/10/2009 4:09:39 PM

Alisa's perspective really resonates and sums up the higher-order interests and behaviors of today's western society. Can Gallup define these short-term behaviors that are imbedded in our society? I would love to see some historical comparitives from Gallup to validate, or disprove, this perpsective voer the past two generations.

Posted On 12/10/2009 11:46:13 PM

Perhaps the "Brand Loyalty" was also a defensive strategy like "a known enemy is better than an unknown friend". In the days when products or services were not as uniform in quality as they are today, a product or service meeting most expectations would command loyalty. In today's world, when one product or service as as good (or bad) as others, the price and not the brand is likely to be the winner.

Posted On 12/11/2009 9:30:11 AM

It’s simple. Customer loyalty is based on the customer’s own self-interest. It stems from the basic notion that customers want quality products and services at a competitive price from those companies with whom they do business. Customers go back to those companies which provide this experience and avoid those who don’t.

Melinda Felice Posted On 12/14/2009 1:42:27 PM

customer loyalty has been beaten out of customers by the companies themselves. Years of encouraging people to switch back and forth between phone and cable companies by promising free months of service, rebates, etc. have actively discouraged any loyalty by saying "screw you" to their existing customers! also, the internet search for the lowest prices helps us frame everything in terms of money, with NO consideration given to quality or customer service. and since we practically assume poor customer service anyway, there is little or no incentive to consider it in our purchasing decisions.

Tomas Bogren Posted On 12/20/2009 7:09:54 AM

Customer loyalty is not to a company. It is between people.
Treat your employees good and they will treat your customers good in return.
But remember employees are not a group of people, they are individuals who has different needs.

Posted On 1/4/2010 1:09:34 PM

I don't think consumers are loyal to brands. I think we find a product we like and buy it consistently until we find something we like better or better meets our needs.

The only way I would truly be loyal to a company is if they were doing something good for the world, making it a better place. Emotionally, I would support that. However, if we're honest, I think most of us (and by us I mean Americans...no offense) are unwilling to repeatedly and consistently pay a premium for it.

Personally, I am loyal to only one brand/store: HEB (Grocery store, Texas) because they consistently offer the best shopping experience. However, I purposely don't go bargain hunting for groceries. It's possible that Wal-Mart is cheaper but I'd rather not know...I want to continue to enjoy my HEB experience without feeling like or knowing that I'm paying more for it.

Please Login to Comment
  • Print this page
  • E-mail to a friend
  • Share
  • Message to the Author
See Also
Planning for the “New Normal”

Wellbeing

New York Times bestseller reveals the results of a landmark study of
wellbeing -- and its implications for organizations and individuals
Learn more ...

Wellbeing: The Five Essential Elements

Gallup Summit Spring 2012

This event provides leaders with the opportunity to discuss the crucial issues that affect maximizing performance in their organizations, learn best practices, and benchmark their practices against the world's best.