02 June 2009

Scientific, Systematic Succession Planning

Picking successors the right way is hard, but it solves many performance issues

A GMJ Q&A with Randall Beck, a Gallup senior managing partner
Succession planning involves much more than filling in boxes on an organizational chart. If it’s done right -- that is, scientifically and systematically -- it creates a pool of leadership talent that can drive an organization, engage employees, and increase shareholder value.
The content you are attempting to access is for subscribers to the Gallup Management Journal. You can subscribe by choosing the GMJ as one of your subscription selections under My Account. If you are already a subscriber,please log in.
Reader Comments
Luuk de Jong Posted On 6/12/2009 6:21:57 AM

I would like to understand how the BEST test in the world mentioned in this article (5 dimensions) relates to strengthsfinder principles (4 domains).
Was DRIVE added?
Why another typology? Gallups full portfolio should remain transparant.

Barry Conchie Posted On 6/24/2009 12:34:11 AM

Luuk, here's an answer to your question above.

The five dimensions including drive are derived from Gallup’s Executive Leadership Interview (ELI), an in-depth leadership assessment, which is a different assessment than StrengthsFinder. ELI is making a prediction of executive level leadership performance. StrengthsFinder and the 4 Domains of Leadership is aimed at helping teams and individuals at all levels or an organization, to think about the balance of their leadership strengths. StrengthsFinder does not make a prediction of future leadership performance. With two different assessments designed for completely different purposes it is not surprising that the research dimensions and domains are different.

JOVEN SAN PEDRO Posted On 7/22/2009 8:36:40 PM

Please educate me on the ELI.
How culture-free are the executive leadership performance predictors?Does ELI factor in differences brought about by nature of business,existing challenges at executive's entry, on-boarding/transition management process,etc? What do current research data say about their ability to actually predict successful executive performance.

Barry Conchie Posted On 7/27/2009 9:46:23 AM

Joven, here is an answer to your question above. The ELI is an in-depth, structured interview comprising questions with researched, psychometric properties that in combination provide a prediction of future leadership performance. Initial research and subsequent validation studies have been conducted cross-culturally within client organizations revealing minimal cultural bias. The ELI provides effective insights into how leaders will adapt to and perform in different business scenarios. We do not change the assessment dependent on these scenarios, or to reflect them, because doing so would remove the predictive ability of the tool - these are factors that highly skilled analysts with a deep knowledge of a business are qualified to navigate. Research has shown the ELI to be a remarkably strong predictor of leadership performance both in client based and broader meta-analytical studies. If this is an area of greater interest then please contact your nearest Gallup Office (http://www.gallup.com/corporate/1276/Global-Offices.aspx) and they will be happy to provide more detailed information.

Please Login to Comment

Customer Engagement: Going Beyond Satisfaction

How do world-class organizations rise to the top in today's intensely competitive, turbulent global marketplace? High-performance organizations recognize the emotional drivers of human nature and leverage them to drive performance, one customer at a time.

This event will take place from 08:30 to 11:45 at the Gallup London office (The Adelphi, 1-11 John Adam Street, London WC2N 6HS). There is cost to register. To learn more or to register, visit the Customer Engagement: Going Beyond Satisfaction page on the Gallup Consulting Web site or contact James Rapinac on +44 (0)20 7950 4433.

For a complete schedule of learning opportunities, visit the Gallup Learning Events page.