SOURCE: http://gmj.gallup.com CONTACT: Gallup Management Journal INFORMATION: Editorial and Executive Offices 1251 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 2350 New York, NY 10020 +1.888.274.5447
19 February 2009

Building Engagement in This Economic Crisis

How managers can maintain morale and profitability in their increasingly anxious workgroups

by Jennifer Robison

The global economy is floundering. All over the world, companies are struggling, from global corporations with worldwide market share to mom-and-pop shops that employ a handful of people. According to the U.S. Department of Labor, the U.S. economy has shed 3.6 million jobs since the start of the recession in December 2007, and the unemployment rate climbed to 7.6% in January 2009. Even China -- for years one of the world's hottest economies -- is feeling the effects of the global economic downturn.

wjvep938r028fpbeaprn6w

There's little managers can do about the economy at large. But there are things they can do to protect their companies, their employees, and themselves. One of the best ways for managers to hedge against professional and organizational disaster is by engaging their employees. Employee engagement -- an emotional attachment between an employee and the workplace -- is always important. But now, it could mean a company's survival.

"In good times, employee engagement is the difference between being good and being great," says James K. Harter, Ph.D., Gallup's chief scientist of workplace management and wellbeing and coauthor of 12: The Elements of Great Managing. "In bad times, it's the difference between surviving and not. In good times and bad, low engagement reduces performance and profit. And under the current circumstances, many companies can't afford to let those drop."

The current state of fear and uncertainty, however, makes it more difficult for managers to keep employees focused and motivated. The Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index, a comprehensive measure of the state of Americans' health, showed a decline in wellbeing in the United States in the past year. "Given the significant changes in the U.S. economy, we have seen significant shifts in the percentage of Americans who are 'thriving,' 'struggling,' and 'suffering,'" says Harter. And managers around the world are likely seeing a similar erosion of wellbeing among their workers as the economic crisis that began in the United States has affected economies around the world.

sxvduariceaehm3rknvvcq

But for managers, keeping employees engaged despite the economic turmoil is key because engagement is directly linked to the performance metrics that matter most to businesses right now. When compared with their industry peers, organizations with more than four engaged employees for every one actively disengaged employee saw 2.6 times more growth in earnings per share than did organizations with a ratio of slightly less than one engaged worker for every one actively disengaged employee. And earnings per share for top-quartile (in engagement) organizations outpaced the earnings per share of bottom-quartile companies by 18%. (See "Investors, Take Note: Engagement Boosts Earnings" in the "See Also" area on this page.)

That's the big picture at the macroeconomic level. On a more micro level, the top quartile of business units boast 12% higher customer advocacy, 18% higher productivity, and 12% higher profitability than bottom-quartile business units. The bottom quartile of business units have 51% more inventory shrinkage, 31% to 51% more employee turnover, and 62% more accidents than business units in the top quartile.

As a result, employee engagement can inoculate business units and companies against lost profitability. And the onus of creating that engagement is on managers, who are the epicenter of the work environment. "Creating engagement in an economic downturn is going to be hardest on middle managers because they're stretched so far," says Denise McLain, Gallup principal. "They have more to do with fewer people, and many of them are concerned about keeping their own jobs."

Engagement culture for rough times

Even if layoffs aren't imminent in a workplace, employees are likely to be worried about how the economy may affect their spouses, their children, or their 401(k) or savings. So helping them formulate a positive emotional response to their work is paramount. Fortunately, there are levers managers can pull to help employees stay positive and engaged. According to Gallup research, employee engagement depends on meeting 12 human needs, such as feeling cared for and being recognized for doing good work. When all 12 of those needs are met, employees can become engaged, sometimes passionately so. Gallup measures how effectively managers and organizations are meeting those needs with a 12-item assessment, the Q12. (See graphic "The 12 Elements of Great Managing.")

acjudubq8kkpflezh9za7g

The first six Q12 items refer to the foundational aspects of working that get at the heart of the employment relationship: As an employee, what do I give, and what do I get in return from my company? They provide a relatively efficient barometer of employees' emotions and how well supervisors are managing change.

"Use the first six items of the Q12 as a base for managing emotions," says Scot Caldwell, a Gallup learning solutions consultant. "They can provide a guide to what managers need to do to encourage engagement and can help them strategically meet the needs of their employees as those needs arise -- and those emotional needs will change day to day." (See sidebar "Managing in Turbulent Times.")

Managing in Turbulent Times

These six tips can help managers keep employees focused and engaged in times of change:

  • Tell employees what you expect from them. Employees are bombarded by bad economic news these days, and they can easily become distracted and lose focus. Managers can keep them on track by regularly communicating expectations, even ones they think are implied or understood.
  • Make sure employees have the right materials and equipment. When budgets are limited, employees may not have what they need to get their work done, and they may feel like they shouldn't ask for anything. Managers should be proactive about checking to see if their staff members have what they need to do their jobs. And if managers can't fulfill a request, they should explain why.
  • Give people the opportunity to do what they do best. One of the most effective ways to get the most out of employees is to give them the chance to do what they do best every day. Managers should assess whether their employees have an opportunity to maximize their strengths and greatest talents in their current roles -- and if not, make adjustments. It's a quick and inexpensive tactic that can deliver immediate results in improved attitudes and productivity.
  • Don't forget to give recognition or praise. Donald O. Clifton, Ph.D., who was known as the "Father of Strengths Psychology," often stated that "We are never as strong as when we have our successes clearly in mind." The best managers celebrate successes, including the less dramatic ones, and recognize workers individually. Even a workplace's best employees may be questioning themselves these days. In rough times, a pat on the back means a lot.
  • Let your employees know you care about them. Employees may be dealing with negative emotions that can undermine their work, and it's a mistake for managers to make assumptions about what employees may be thinking or feeling. Taking the time to understand what's going on with everyone on their team will make it easier for managers to help and guide employees. It also creates a personal, human connection, which is a requisite of engagement.
  • Keep encouraging their development. Developing employees may be the last thing on most managers' minds right now. But talking with employees about how they can grow professionally shows that managers care -- and reassures employees that they and the company have a future. Investing in employees' development now will help position them -- and the company -- when good times return.
Keeping the first six Q12 items on their mental desktop is a good way for managers to assess and bolster moment-by-moment employee engagement. "Now, more than ever, managers should know their employees well. Some of them may have lost a friend to layoffs, or some may have a spouse who has lost a job. All of them are worried," says Harter. "The more you know what employees are thinking and feeling, the more you can show your employees how to be part of the solution rather than a victim." fdqnxn8ayekgrbwwue

Being part of the solution requires a structure that counteracts the distractions that rapid economic change can inflict. The best structure for maintaining engagement is one that promotes recognition, caring, stability, security, hope, and wellbeing -- things we all need to get through the day productively, according to Gallup management experts.

Recognition

Recognition provides employees with a personal, positive indication that they are valued contributors. This can be incredibly powerful when economic news is unrelentingly negative. "If managers aren't able to give employees pay increases or lighten their load," says McLain, "emotional and psychological support is important and may improve productivity."

Managers shouldn't reserve recognition only for big wins; they should applaud small victories too. In good times or in bad, managers must know how their employees prefer to be recognized. Some crave public recognition, some want a private word with the boss, and others want a piece of paper they can frame and put on the wall. It's important to get it right, because when it comes to recognition, individualization matters. (See "The Best Ways to Recognize Employees" in the "See Also" area on this page.)

Though managers tend to think of recognition as a reward for a job well done, it also pays to recognize an individual's greatest talents. People are more likely to be productive and engaged when they're working in an area that maximizes the ways in which they most naturally think, feel, and behave -- and that rewards both the worker and the manager. If managers have the latitude, they should consider ways to move people into work that plays to their talents.

It also helps morale to focus discussions on employees' strengths rather than their weaknesses. "I recommend spending maybe eighty percent of your time talking about an employee's strengths and twenty percent on things they should improve," says Tom Rath, Gallup global practice leader and coauthor of Strengths Based Leadership.

Stability and security

It's natural for employees to be fearful in uncertain economic times. But fear paralyzes them, which only makes things worse. "Fear undermines even the more stable companies because employees don't know where the company or the economy or the community is going," says Shane Lopez, Ph.D., a Gallup Senior Scientist in residence and a leading researcher of hope. "Fear of the unknown is exacerbated by certain behaviors that leaders and managers exhibit when they're fearful -- they shut down. That makes people less likely to gather and distribute the information that they need."

The antidote to fear in today's circumstances is stability and security. Managers may not be able to promise everybody that they'll keep their jobs -- and if they can't, they shouldn't. If employees suspect that the boss is stonewalling or sugarcoating, they can become even more fearful, which can further destabilize their engagement. So managers should strive to be honest and candid while keeping the work environment as close to normal as possible.

In practical terms, this means making March 2009 seem as much as possible like March 2008. Managers should listen and respond to workers' concerns, give them whatever information they can -- without scaring them unnecessarily, then get back to business as usual. And don't tell employees that they should feel lucky to have a job at all. "If you operate on a sense of gratitude, that's not going to make people feel secure because that's actually a threat," says Barry Conchie, Gallup leadership expert and coauthor of Strengths Based Leadership. "Implied threats are a recipe for very significant disengagement."

One way to preserve stability is through office traditions. Managers may not be able to conduct them as they used to -- the employee who always circulated the birthday cards may be gone, and the company may not have the budget for the holiday party -- but keeping up traditions helps.

For example, Amy Jurgens is the director of a department at a college that's rapidly shedding workers. She used to order pizza for her staff every Friday but no longer has the funding. "But we still have lunch together every Friday," Jurgens says. "I didn't suggest a potluck thing because some of us can't afford it or don't have the time to cook like that. But I actively encourage us all to eat together every Friday -- and you'd be surprised at how many bring frozen pizza."

Wellbeing

When stress mounts, eating well, exercising, and getting enough sleep are all crucial to maintaining wellbeing. So managers should encourage employees to practice healthy behaviors. A healthy team is likely to have fewer sick days and fewer accidents, which contribute to the bottom line. Engagement also can help promote wellbeing -- the more engaged the worker, the less likely he or she is to come in or call in sick. One Gallup study found that in a 10,000 person company, disengagement represents 5,000 days of absence, equaling $600,000 in lost salary alone.

"There's an interaction between susceptibility to sickness and a lousy work environment," says Harter. "A good environment can make people less susceptible to missing work." (See "Your Job May Be Killing You" in the "See Also" area on this page.)

There's also a strong psychological component to wellbeing, and a good work environment affects that too. When Gallup surveys workers on their sense of wellbeing, people in positive work environments are significantly more likely to be thriving in their overall lives and have better daily experiences such as happiness, learning something interesting, being treated with respect, and less stress. And fortunately, the work environment is one of the few things managers can control and improve.

However, the evidence suggests that managers should be on the watch for an erosion of employee wellbeing. According to Harter and Raksha Arora, a Gallup senior consultant, the Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index shows "a steady downward trend in the percentage of people who are thriving in 2008, particularly among full-time workers who are married with children. This downward trend correlates with changes in how people perceive their personal standard of living. But more recent research indicates that the decline in thriving Americans is particularly pronounced among workers with dissatisfying work or a bad boss." (See "A Low-Quality Job Makes a Tough Economy Tougher" in the "See Also" area on this page.)

Don't forget your own engagement

If this advice sounds like the stuff of good management, it is. It just has to be done consciously and with great sensitivity. "The basics of good management don't change, but they do get harder in tough times," says Caldwell. "Employees always need to trust their leaders and managers, and they always need to feel cared for. Right now, they need it a little more."

However, it's important to note that managers need to be engaged too. They also need to feel cared for, recognized, and safe when things are at their worst. Managers who are not engaged are going to have a very difficult time engaging their teams. So managers -- whatever you're giving your staff, make sure you get a big helping of it yourself.

Jennifer Robison is a Senior Editor for the Gallup Management Journal.

The Q12 items are protected by copyright of Gallup, Inc., 1993-1998. All rights reserved.

Reader Comments
Judy Nelson Posted On 3/12/2009 11:50:22 AM

Congratulations on an except article. It is clear, concise and obvioiusly timely. My question is: how do these techniques differ from the ones that managers/leaders should be using every day in good times and bad?

Judy Nelson, JD, MSW
Certified Professional Coach and Leadership Trainer
www.CoachJudyNelson.com

Bay Jordan Posted On 3/12/2009 12:38:20 PM

It is great to see the need for engagement continuing to be emphasised in these tough economic times, and this article is certainly packed with plenty of sound advice. But, and I am not just being cynical here, I cannot help but question how practical this advice is when companies are shedding numbers on the scale they are? (The BBC reported last week that the job losses in the US in the period were actually 4.4 million.) Assuming the cliche of an average family with 2.5 kids, means 15.4 million have been directly affected, not includingthe diminished hope for those who were already unemployed.

In an economy like this, fear is probably the biggest single factor, and any 'top-down' efforts to win employee engagement, if they have any effect at all, are likely to be very limited if:
a) The employer has already laid of people or is considered likely to do so.
b) Positive efforts to win employee engagement have not been practised previously. If they haven't this 'new leaf' will simply excarbate scpeticism.

Thus, if organisations are serious about employee engagement and retaining their competitive edge in both the short and long term, they are going to have to find new ways of building trust. This will require less top-down approaches, with greater workplace democracy, considerably improved communication with more involvement in the decision making processes by the workplace stakeholders. Perhaps now is the time to move away from terms like 'HR' and 'employees' and start moving towards recognising people for the assets they are, rather than continuing with the historical treatment of them as costs. This combined with greater worker ownership of the business, would create the highest possible level of employee engagement, and ensure they understand and are committed to doing whatever it takes to save 'their' business and spread the burden more equitably rather than leaving an unfortunate proportion to bear the full brunt.

Surely that would be better than the massive 'cost-cutting' redundancy programmes that actually compound the macro-economic problems?

Tom Short Posted On 3/12/2009 2:16:17 PM

This is a great article and advice more organizations should take to heart. We believe engagement a critical consideration in good and bad times. In good times, you need to find ways to engage your employees to compete for talent and drive commitment beyond compensation. In tough times, especially when difficult decisions are required, communication and engagement can be the difference between a demoralized and fearful team and positive and proactive team.

Engagement and culture are closely tied as well and it is never too late to start or cynical to start a program in down times. The companies that do find ways to engage their employees will weather the storm and come out stronger on the other side. It does not have to be an expensive or complicated program either - in fact I would advise against it. The best programs are ones that are used. We use a simple recognition program around saying "thank you" that encourages peer to peer communication as well as management to staff. This simple system has made a significant difference in how people feel about the company and through positive feedback can encourage and engage individuals, helping build moral, focus and a sense of connection, even in difficult times. www.kudosnow.com

Karl Buchanan Posted On 3/13/2009 8:02:46 PM

Proven Value of Focused Engagment: In April 2008, manufacturing plant management team recognized a serious risk to the future of their business, including decreased production results, increased employee disengagement, poor leader performance, and increased turnover due to dependence on a temporary seasonal workforce. After a detailed analysis, the senior leadership made a commitment to design, build, pilot, and rollout a system to attack these symptoms. Within 8-months the plant developed a synchronized and integrated Human Capital Management Performance Improvement System focused in Employee Engagement. Leader goals were aligned to match organizational goals. Scorecards were developed for key business processes and leaders were held to core metrics. A Workforce Skills Depth Chart was developed for the entire organization to track the skills required to produce value for the company. A High Performing Recruiting Profile was developed to focus recruiting efforts on the best potential employees. The New Employee On-Boarding Process was completely redesigned to include a Realistic Job Preview with an electronic application to streamline hiring. Each new employee pipeline was analyzed to determine which pipeline produced the best new hires. A Deboarding Plan was implemented to ensure that seasonal employees being laid off remained engaged in preparation for the Spring 2009 season. The program exceeded every goal in the Fall 2008 pilot -productivity increased by 13%; new worker attrition was reduced by 32%; units produced per labor hour increased 22%; and direct labor hours were reduced 6.6%.

Please Login to Comment
  • Print this page
  • E-mail to a friend
  • Share
  • Message to the Author
See Also
How U.S. Bank Weathers the Crisis
LEIRedirect
Investors, Take Note: Engagement Boosts Earnings
The Business Case for Instilling Hope
Your Job May Be Killing You
The Best Ways to Recognize Employees

Wellbeing

New York Times bestseller reveals the results of a landmark study of
wellbeing -- and its implications for organizations and individuals
Learn more ...

Wellbeing: The Five Essential Elements

Gallup Summit Spring 2012

This event provides leaders with the opportunity to discuss the crucial issues that affect maximizing performance in their organizations, learn best practices, and benchmark their practices against the world's best.